So, here we are … AGAIN.
Two innocent people die, another is injured. And another kook with a gun ruins lives,
families, and friends of the victims forever, before he cowardly kills himself. This is what America has become in 2015. But
this time, at least to me, it seems more personal.
I didn’t know Alison Parker or Adam Ward but I had been in
their same spot thousands of times over the years. On the air live, totally focused on the job
at hand, oblivious to what was going on behind you, no protection around
you. It is every TV journalist’s fear
that someone will do something to interrupt you while you’re live. I’ve had it happen to me. Some interruptions were more serious than
others, but never life threatening. Only
recently, in 2015, has the talk in the industry turned to the real dangers that
now accompany any news crew whenever they go out into the public, particularly during
live shots when they are often alone and extremely vulnerable. Today, that talk turned into reality.
Today’s unprovoked assassination was also made more personal,
not just to TV journalists, but to the country at large. Because this time, the
murders happened on live TV. Thousands
watched two lives being snuffed out by the shooter as it happened (and millions
more saw it later). Even the local Franklin
County sheriff in charge of the investigation, Bill Overton, said he was
watching the WDBJ-7 news as he was preparing for work when he heard the
gunshots and watched his friends fall (he had worked with the two victims on
previous news stories). Subsequently,
the gunman posted his own point of view video recorded on his cell phone as he unloaded his deadly barrage of gunfire. Yes, that’s what it has become. Another gunman proud of his deadly
accomplishments. As presidential press
secretary Josh Earnest said today, it is all too common now across America.
I talked with TV friends today who are still working at
stations in both Sacramento and San Francisco.
In the Bay Area, armed guards now accompany news crews on stories that
take place in dangerous areas. But that
has not stopped the violence. Last
month, two news crews from NBC11 and Fox2 in the Bay Area, were robbed at
gunpoint as they prepared for a live shot.
A photographer was pistol whipped.
A suspect was eventually arrested.
Some of my former co-workers now say they are more fearful than ever
about just doing their job.
But then that is the case for many people, regardless of
where you work or play. Military
recruiting centers, theaters, elementary schools, restaurants, college
campuses, office buildings … all have become targets of crazed gunmen. What place is safe anymore?
There is a seemingly common denominator in each of these
tragedies. First, the killer is usually delusional
in some way. Second, he has a gun. So, what needs to change? First, there must be better screening for
gun sales. There needs to be better
mental health care. And, there needs to
be a change of attitude in America with regards to the acceptance of a
gun-toting killing society.
I will admit, I was
concerned about writing this today and posting it. Back on June 18th when I commented
on Facebook about the Charleston massacre at a black church at the hands of a
white supremacist, and asked when is this going to stop, I was challenged by a
card carrying member of the NRA. It was intimidating. But earlier today I was chatting with another
former reporter from northern California and she reminded me that if we don’t
speak out against this deadly gun violence, there is little chance than
anything will change. And there does
need to be a change. There is no
question about it.
The reality is, even if guns were banned outright tomorrow, little would
change in our lifetime. But eventually,
it would change for future generations. In 100 years, the AK47s
that so many private citizens seem to have a penchant for these days would be
considered antiques 100 years from now.
The handguns, such as the one used today, would slowly (very slowly)
fade into oblivion. A total ban on guns
is probably not the answer (there are legitimate recreational and hunting uses
for guns). What is the answer? I don’t know.
But I do know it is not as NRA chief Wayne LaPierre suggests … that all citizens should be armed to protect themselves. If you listen to that type of reasoning,
Alison Parker would have done her live shot today with a microphone in one hand
and an Uzi in the other. And she still
would have been killed. Because she was
ambushed from behind … by a kook with a gun.
5 comments:
If Sandy Hook didn't do it, I don't know what will...
Well said Dan. Thank You
well put..m'friend. every time i'm downtown..i see more evidence of 'the wanderers' suffering mental health issues.
just this week while at Harv's getting the car washed..in the space of an hour 2 women..separately..yelling at anything they passed..cars..houses..people.
working at making these folks well..or giving them safe haven..is one hands-on way to get at this terrible problem we have.
otherwise..on the gun thing..it'll just be more jawboning. best...stan
Dan, let me be the first to say, "Great piece!" Thanks for putting my thoughts together so nicely!!!! <3 you!
I am a member of a gun violence task force at a large Los Angeles area church. Thanks so much for making this statement. So many of us have been touched by gun violence in our families. We all need to speak out and help the public understand how close we are to this issue.
Judith Carter
Post a Comment